Meta Framework Data v1.2.0 Updated 2025-12-28

Astro

The web framework for content-driven websites

56.2k 1.2M/week Unknown N/A
88 /100
Strong pick Good confidence (85%)

Quick Verdict

Best For

  • Documentation sites and blogs
  • Marketing and landing pages
  • Content-heavy websites prioritizing SEO
  • Projects mixing multiple UI frameworks

Consider Alternatives If

  • Highly interactive web applications
  • Real-time features requiring WebSockets
  • Projects needing single framework consistency

Score Breakdown

6 dimensions evaluated with transparent methodology

Performance
96 −4

Industry-leading performance with zero JS by default and island architecture

  • Zero JavaScript shipped by default
  • Island architecture for selective hydration
  • Static-first with optional server rendering
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Dynamic features require explicit hydration
  • −2 Not optimal for highly interactive apps
Developer Experience
88 −12

Familiar syntax with unique multi-framework support

  • Component syntax similar to JSX/Vue SFCs
  • Use React, Vue, Svelte, Solid in same project
  • File-based routing with layouts
Why not 100%:
  • −6 Learning curve for island architecture
  • −6 Multi-framework mixing can be complex
Ecosystem
72 −28

Rapidly growing ecosystem focused on content and documentation

  • Official integrations for major frameworks
  • Growing theme and starter ecosystem
  • Active Discord community (40K+ members)
Why not 100%:
  • −9 Newer than Next.js/Nuxt ecosystems
  • −9 Fewer enterprise-focused integrations
  • −9 Some integrations still maturing
Maintainability
88 −12

Stable releases with strong corporate backing and clear vision

  • Funded company with dedicated team
  • Clear semantic versioning
  • Comprehensive migration guides
Why not 100%:
  • −6 Relatively young framework (v1 in 2022)
  • −6 API may evolve as patterns emerge
Cost Efficiency
95 −5

Fully open-source with minimal hosting requirements

  • MIT licensed, no vendor lock-in
  • Static output runs anywhere
  • Edge and serverless adapters available
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Server-side features need hosting consideration
  • −2 Some integrations may add costs
Compliance
86 −14

Solid security with static-first architecture reducing attack surface

  • Static by default reduces security surface
  • No client-side data exposure by default
  • Clear security policy
Why not 100%:
  • −7 Newer framework, fewer audits
  • −7 Server features need separate compliance

Compare Alternatives

How Astro stacks up against similar technologies

TechnologyOverallPerfDXEcosystem
Current Astro88968872
SvelteKit Full-stack with excellent DX89Compare →
Next.js React-focused, larger ecosystem86Compare →
Nuxt Vue-focused, similar content features84Compare →
Remix React-focused, progressive enhancement82Compare →

Sources & Methodology

How we calculate these scores: transparent and reproducible

Deterministic Scoring

Same inputs always produce the same outputs. We use versioned lookup tables, not LLM opinions. Every score is explainable and reproducible.

Learn how it works →
primary

GitHub

Repository activity, stars, contributors, issue resolution time

primary

NPM Registry

Weekly downloads, package dependencies, version history

secondary

Bundlephobia

Bundle size, tree-shaking efficiency, dependency weight

secondary

OSV Database

Known vulnerabilities, security advisories, CVE tracking

contextual

Community Signals

Stack Overflow activity, Discord engagement, developer surveys

Data version: 1.2.0 Last updated: 2025-12-28 Confidence: 85% Metrics: 26/01/2026

Frequently Asked