Meta Framework Data v1.2.0 Updated 2025-12-28

Remix

Web standards-first React framework

32.2k 418k/week Unknown N/A
84 /100
Strong pick Good confidence (88%)

Quick Verdict

Best For

  • Teams prioritizing web fundamentals
  • Applications requiring progressive enhancement
  • Projects with complex data requirements
  • Developers who prefer explicit over magic

Consider Alternatives If

  • Teams wanting maximum abstraction
  • Simple static sites (Astro better suited)
  • Projects avoiding React dependency

Score Breakdown

6 dimensions evaluated with transparent methodology

Performance
88 −12

Excellent performance through progressive enhancement and parallel data loading

  • Parallel data loading via nested routes
  • Progressive enhancement works without JavaScript
  • Efficient caching with standard HTTP headers
Why not 100%:
  • −6 React runtime overhead vs compiled frameworks
  • −6 Bundle size larger than Svelte alternatives
Developer Experience
85 −15

Clean mental model built on web fundamentals with powerful data patterns

  • Loaders and Actions provide clear data flow
  • Form handling without client-side state management
  • File-based routing with nested layouts
Why not 100%:
  • −7 Steeper learning curve for React SPA developers
  • −7 Less "magic" means more explicit code
Ecosystem
70 −30

Focused ecosystem prioritizing quality over quantity

  • Growing community with engaged core team
  • Integration with React ecosystem and libraries
  • Shopify investment and enterprise adoption
Why not 100%:
  • −10 Smaller package ecosystem than Next.js
  • −10 Fewer third-party integrations available
  • −10 Community resources still growing
Maintainability
88 −12

Stable architecture backed by Shopify with long-term commitment

  • Acquired by Shopify ensuring long-term funding
  • Web standards foundation means less framework churn
  • Clear semantic versioning
Why not 100%:
  • −6 React Router 7 merger may require adaptation
  • −6 Framework philosophy shifts possible
Cost Efficiency
85 −15

Open-source with deployment flexibility and no vendor lock-in

  • MIT licensed, fully open-source
  • Deploy to any Node.js or edge runtime
  • No required paid services or platforms
Why not 100%:
  • −7 Complex deployments require DevOps knowledge
  • −7 Some hosting platforms lack native adapters
Compliance
90 −10

Strong security posture with web standards alignment

  • Built-in CSRF protection via form tokens
  • Server-first architecture reduces attack surface
  • Progressive enhancement ensures resilience
Why not 100%:
  • −5 No framework-level SOC 2 certification
  • −5 Enterprise compliance depends on deployment

Compare Alternatives

How Remix stacks up against similar technologies

TechnologyOverallPerfDXEcosystem
Current Remix84888570
SvelteKit Better performance, different paradigm89Compare →
Next.js Larger ecosystem, more magic86Compare →
Nuxt Vue-based, similar philosophy84Compare →
Astro Content-focused, partial hydration85Compare →

Sources & Methodology

How we calculate these scores: transparent and reproducible

Deterministic Scoring

Same inputs always produce the same outputs. We use versioned lookup tables, not LLM opinions. Every score is explainable and reproducible.

Learn how it works →
primary

GitHub

Repository activity, stars, contributors, issue resolution time

primary

NPM Registry

Weekly downloads, package dependencies, version history

secondary

Bundlephobia

Bundle size, tree-shaking efficiency, dependency weight

secondary

OSV Database

Known vulnerabilities, security advisories, CVE tracking

contextual

Community Signals

Stack Overflow activity, Discord engagement, developer surveys

Data version: 1.2.0 Last updated: 2025-12-28 Confidence: 88% Metrics: 26/01/2026

Frequently Asked