Meta Framework Data v1.2.0 Updated 2025-12-28

SvelteKit

The fastest way to build Svelte apps

20.2k 851k/week Unknown N/A
89 /100
Strong pick High confidence (92%)

Quick Verdict

Best For

  • Solo developers and small teams prioritizing speed
  • Performance-critical applications
  • Progressive web apps with offline capabilities
  • Projects requiring minimal bundle size

Consider Alternatives If

  • Teams heavily invested in React ecosystem
  • Projects requiring extensive third-party integrations
  • Enterprises requiring long-term LTS guarantees

Top Alternatives

Score Breakdown

6 dimensions evaluated with transparent methodology

Performance
95 −5

Exceptional runtime performance with minimal JavaScript overhead

  • Compile-time optimization eliminates virtual DOM overhead
  • Smallest bundle size among major meta-frameworks (avg. 15-30KB gzipped)
  • Native streaming SSR with progressive hydration support
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Edge streaming not as mature as Next.js
  • −2 Partial hydration still experimental
Developer Experience
94 −6

Intuitive APIs with minimal boilerplate and excellent tooling

  • Single-file components with collocated styles and logic
  • TypeScript-first with full type inference
  • Instant HMR with state preservation
Why not 100%:
  • −3 Svelte 5 runes syntax learning curve
  • −3 Fewer IDE plugins than React/Vue
Ecosystem
72 −28

Growing ecosystem with strong community momentum

  • Active Discord community (50K+ members)
  • Rich official adapters for major platforms
  • Growing library of UI component packages
Why not 100%:
  • −7 Smaller package ecosystem than React (5x fewer packages)
  • −7 Fewer enterprise-ready component libraries
  • −7 Limited headless CMS integrations
Maintainability
88 −12

Stable releases with clear upgrade paths

  • Backed by Vercel with dedicated core team
  • Semantic versioning with detailed changelogs
  • Migration guides for breaking changes
Why not 100%:
  • −6 Svelte 4 → 5 migration requires code changes
  • −6 Smaller talent pool for hiring
Cost Efficiency
95 −5

Open source with minimal infrastructure requirements

  • Fully open source under MIT license
  • Low memory footprint reduces hosting costs
  • Efficient edge deployment with adapters
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Some adapters require specific hosting
  • −2 No official managed hosting platform
Compliance
82 −18

Solid security foundations with growing enterprise adoption

  • Built-in CSRF protection
  • Content Security Policy helpers
  • No known critical vulnerabilities
Why not 100%:
  • −6 No SOC 2 or ISO certification (framework)
  • −6 Fewer enterprise security audits than Next.js
  • −6 No official security bounty program

Compare Alternatives

How SvelteKit stacks up against similar technologies

TechnologyOverallPerfDXEcosystem
Current SvelteKit89959472
Next.js Larger ecosystem, more enterprise adoption86Compare →
Nuxt Vue-based, excellent developer experience84Compare →
Remix Web standards focus, nested routing82Compare →
Astro Content-focused, multi-framework support85Compare →

Sources & Methodology

How we calculate these scores: transparent and reproducible

Deterministic Scoring

Same inputs always produce the same outputs. We use versioned lookup tables, not LLM opinions. Every score is explainable and reproducible.

Learn how it works →
primary

GitHub

Repository activity, stars, contributors, issue resolution time

primary

NPM Registry

Weekly downloads, package dependencies, version history

secondary

Bundlephobia

Bundle size, tree-shaking efficiency, dependency weight

secondary

OSV Database

Known vulnerabilities, security advisories, CVE tracking

contextual

Community Signals

Stack Overflow activity, Discord engagement, developer surveys

Data version: 1.2.0 Last updated: 2025-12-28 Confidence: 92% Metrics: 26/01/2026

Frequently Asked