Head-to-Head Analysis

Astro vs Next.js

Q: Is Astro better than Next.js?

Based on our deterministic scoring, Next.js scores higher overall (86/100 vs 81/100). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs.

Q: Which has better performance, Astro or Next.js?

Next.js scores 68/100 for performance compared to Astro's 30/100.

Q: Is Astro easier to learn than Next.js?

Astro has a higher developer experience score (98/100) compared to Next.js (90/100), suggesting it may be easier to learn and use.

Q: Which has a larger ecosystem, Astro or Next.js?

Next.js has a larger ecosystem (100/100) with more libraries, plugins, and community resources than Astro (100/100).

Q: Can I migrate from Astro to Next.js?

Migration between Astro and Next.js is possible but requires careful planning. Consider the differences in architecture, syntax, and ecosystem. We recommend a gradual migration approach for production applications.

Q: Which is more cost-effective, Astro or Next.js?

Next.js scores 90/100 for cost efficiency compared to Astro's 90/100, making it potentially more cost-effective for most use cases.

An objective, data-driven comparison based on 6 key criteria

The Verdict

Next.js

86 /100 (+5 pts)

Astro

2 criteria won

Winner

Next.js

1 criteria won

Criteria Breakdown

Score out of 100 for each criterion

Criteria	Astro	Next.js
Performance	30	68 ✓
Developer Experience	98 ✓	90
Ecosystem	100	100
Maintainability	85 ✓	80
Cost	90	90
Compliance	85	85
Total Score	81	86

→

Best For

rapid development and enterprise projects

↻

Choose Astro If

you prioritize developer experience or maintainability

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Astro better than Next.js?

Which has better performance, Astro or Next.js?

Is Astro easier to learn than Next.js?

Which has a larger ecosystem, Astro or Next.js?

Can I migrate from Astro to Next.js?

Which is more cost-effective, Astro or Next.js?

Build Your Complete Stack

Get personalized recommendations for your entire tech stack in 2 minutes.

Try StacksFinder Free