Frontend Framework Data v1.2.0 Updated 2025-12-28

Svelte

Cybernetically enhanced web apps

85.6k 2.5M/week Unknown N/A
87 /100
Strong pick High confidence (90%)

Quick Verdict

Best For

  • Performance-critical applications
  • Projects where bundle size matters
  • Developers preferring minimal boilerplate
  • Interactive widgets and embeds

Consider Alternatives If

  • Projects requiring maximum ecosystem access
  • Teams needing large hiring pools
  • Enterprises requiring extensive third-party components

Top Alternatives

Score Breakdown

6 dimensions evaluated with transparent methodology

Performance
95 −5

Industry-leading performance through compile-time optimization

  • No virtual DOM - direct DOM manipulation
  • Compile-time optimization eliminates runtime overhead
  • Smallest bundle size among major frameworks (~3KB)
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Initial compile time can be slower for large apps
  • −2 Less runtime flexibility than virtual DOM approaches
Developer Experience
92 −8

Minimal boilerplate with intuitive syntax and excellent tooling

  • Single-file components with clean syntax
  • Less boilerplate than React/Vue
  • Svelte 5 runes for explicit reactivity
Why not 100%:
  • −4 Svelte 5 runes require relearning
  • −4 Fewer IDE extensions than React
Ecosystem
65 −35

Growing ecosystem with strong community momentum

  • Active Discord community (50K+ members)
  • SvelteKit for full-stack development
  • Growing component library ecosystem
Why not 100%:
  • −8 Significantly smaller than React ecosystem
  • −8 Fewer enterprise UI component libraries
  • −8 Limited third-party integrations
Maintainability
90 −10

Stable core with Vercel backing and clear vision

  • Rich Harris leads consistent development
  • Vercel funding ensures long-term stability
  • Clear semantic versioning
Why not 100%:
  • −5 Svelte 4 to 5 requires code changes
  • −5 Smaller maintainer team
Cost Efficiency
95 −5

Open-source with minimal infrastructure requirements

  • MIT licensed, fully free
  • Smaller bundles reduce bandwidth costs
  • Lower memory usage reduces hosting costs
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Premium component libraries may be needed
  • −2 Training costs for new syntax
Compliance
85 −15

Growing enterprise adoption with solid security practices

  • No known critical vulnerabilities
  • Compile-time validation catches issues
  • CSP-friendly output
Why not 100%:
  • −7 No framework-level certifications
  • −7 Fewer enterprise security audits

Compare Alternatives

How Svelte stacks up against similar technologies

TechnologyOverallPerfDXEcosystem
Current Svelte87959265
React Larger ecosystem, more jobs85Compare →
Vue Larger ecosystem, template syntax84Compare →
SolidJS Similar performance, React-like API80Compare →

Sources & Methodology

How we calculate these scores: transparent and reproducible

Deterministic Scoring

Same inputs always produce the same outputs. We use versioned lookup tables, not LLM opinions. Every score is explainable and reproducible.

Learn how it works →
primary

GitHub

Repository activity, stars, contributors, issue resolution time

primary

NPM Registry

Weekly downloads, package dependencies, version history

secondary

Bundlephobia

Bundle size, tree-shaking efficiency, dependency weight

secondary

OSV Database

Known vulnerabilities, security advisories, CVE tracking

contextual

Community Signals

Stack Overflow activity, Discord engagement, developer surveys

Data version: 1.2.0 Last updated: 2025-12-28 Confidence: 90% Metrics: 26/01/2026

Frequently Asked