Frontend Framework Data v1.2.0 Updated 2025-12-28

React

The library for building user interfaces

242.5k 70.8M/week Unknown N/A
85 /100
Strong pick High confidence (95%)

Quick Verdict

Best For

  • Large-scale enterprise applications
  • Teams with React expertise
  • Projects requiring extensive third-party integrations
  • Applications with complex UI interactions

Consider Alternatives If

  • Performance-critical applications with tight budgets
  • Small projects where bundle size matters
  • Teams preferring opinionated frameworks

Top Alternatives

Score Breakdown

6 dimensions evaluated with transparent methodology

Performance
75 −25

Good performance with optimization techniques but virtual DOM overhead exists

  • Concurrent rendering with React 18 Suspense
  • Automatic batching reduces re-renders
  • React Server Components eliminate client JS
Why not 100%:
  • −8 Virtual DOM diffing overhead compared to compiled frameworks
  • −8 Hydration can be slow for large applications
  • −8 Manual memoization often required (useMemo, useCallback)
Developer Experience
85 −15

Mature tooling with extensive documentation and learning resources

  • JSX provides intuitive templating
  • Excellent TypeScript integration
  • React DevTools for debugging
Why not 100%:
  • −5 Boilerplate for state management
  • −5 Choice overload for routing, state, styling
  • −5 Hook rules can be confusing for beginners
Ecosystem
95 −5

Unmatched ecosystem with solutions for every use case

  • Largest package ecosystem (100K+ npm packages)
  • Every major library has React bindings
  • Abundant UI component libraries (MUI, Chakra, Radix)
Why not 100%:
  • −2 Quality variance in third-party packages
  • −2 Fragmented solutions for common patterns
Maintainability
80 −20

Stable core with Meta backing but frequent paradigm shifts

  • Meta-backed with dedicated team
  • Semantic versioning with long deprecation cycles
  • Codemods for major migrations
Why not 100%:
  • −10 Class → Hooks → Server Components paradigm shifts
  • −10 Community packages may not keep pace with core changes
Cost Efficiency
90 −10

Free and open-source with no licensing costs

  • MIT licensed with no usage restrictions
  • Free tooling and DevTools
  • Works with any hosting solution
Why not 100%:
  • −5 May require paid component libraries for enterprise UI
  • −5 State management solutions may have costs
Compliance
85 −15

Widely audited with Meta security practices

  • Used by Fortune 500 companies globally
  • Regular security reviews by Meta
  • Documented security best practices
Why not 100%:
  • −7 No framework-level SOC 2 (library, not platform)
  • −7 Security depends on implementation

Compare Alternatives

How React stacks up against similar technologies

TechnologyOverallPerfDXEcosystem
Current React85758595
Vue Better DX, smaller bundle, less ecosystem84Compare →
Svelte Better performance, compiled approach87Compare →
SolidJS Best performance, smaller ecosystem80Compare →

Sources & Methodology

How we calculate these scores: transparent and reproducible

Deterministic Scoring

Same inputs always produce the same outputs. We use versioned lookup tables, not LLM opinions. Every score is explainable and reproducible.

Learn how it works →
primary

GitHub

Repository activity, stars, contributors, issue resolution time

primary

NPM Registry

Weekly downloads, package dependencies, version history

secondary

Bundlephobia

Bundle size, tree-shaking efficiency, dependency weight

secondary

OSV Database

Known vulnerabilities, security advisories, CVE tracking

contextual

Community Signals

Stack Overflow activity, Discord engagement, developer surveys

Data version: 1.2.0 Last updated: 2025-12-28 Confidence: 95% Metrics: 26/01/2026

Frequently Asked