Database Data v1.0.0 Updated 2026-01-29
MongoDB
The document database for modern apps
28.0k 8.6M/week Unknown N/A
84 /100
Quick Verdict
Best For
- Applications with evolving/flexible schemas
- Content management and catalogs
- Real-time analytics with aggregation pipeline
- Mobile apps needing offline sync (Realm)
Consider Alternatives If
- Complex relational data with many JOINs
- Strong ACID transaction requirements
- Teams requiring strict schema enforcement
Top Alternatives
Score Breakdown
6 dimensions evaluated with transparent methodology
Performance
83 −17
Excellent for document workloads, flexible indexing
- Native document model avoids JOINs
- Rich indexing (compound, text, geospatial)
- Horizontal sharding for scale
Why not 100%:
- −8 Slower than SQL for complex relational queries
- −8 Memory-hungry for large working sets
Developer Experience
82 −18
Flexible schema and rich query language
- Schema flexibility - no migrations needed
- Powerful aggregation pipeline
- MongoDB Compass GUI for exploration
Why not 100%:
- −9 Query syntax learning curve
- −9 Transaction support added late (v4.0)
Ecosystem
88 −12
Mature ecosystem with Atlas services
- Official drivers for 12+ languages
- Atlas Search (full-text) built-in
- Atlas Vector Search for AI workloads
Why not 100%:
- −6 Vendor ecosystem around Atlas
- −6 Self-hosted requires more ops expertise
Maintainability
72 −28
Stable but schema flexibility can cause tech debt
- Regular releases with clear versioning
- Atlas handles all ops automatically
- Built-in backup and restore
Why not 100%:
- −9 Schema flexibility can lead to inconsistencies
- −9 Data modeling requires discipline
- −9 Major version upgrades need planning
Cost Efficiency
90 −10
Free tier generous, consumption-based Atlas pricing
- 512MB free Atlas cluster forever
- Self-hosted option (Community Edition)
- Consumption-based pricing scales down
Why not 100%:
- −5 Atlas costs can grow quickly at scale
- −5 Enterprise features require paid tier
Compliance
87 −13
Enterprise-grade security on Atlas
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 (Atlas)
- Field-level encryption (client-side)
- VPC peering and PrivateLink
Why not 100%:
- −6 Advanced security requires Enterprise
- −6 Self-hosted compliance is your responsibility
Compare Alternatives
How MongoDB stacks up against similar technologies
| Technology | Overall | Perf | DX | Ecosystem | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current MongoDB | 84 | 83 | 82 | 88 | |
| PostgreSQL Full ACID, relational model | 85 | — | — | — | Compare → |
| Firebase Google BaaS, real-time sync | 86 | — | — | — | Compare → |
Sources & Methodology
How we calculate these scores: transparent and reproducible
primary
GitHub
Repository activity, stars, contributors, issue resolution time
contextual
Community Signals
Stack Overflow activity, Discord engagement, developer surveys
secondary
OSV Database
Known vulnerabilities, security advisories, CVE tracking
Data version:
1.0.0 Last updated: 2026-01-29 Confidence: 92% Metrics: 26/01/2026