// ARCHITECTURE DECISION

Microservices vs Monolith

Q: Should I start with microservices for my new project?

Almost never. Start with a monolith. You don't know your domain boundaries yet, and microservices add significant complexity. Even companies like Amazon and Netflix started as monoliths. Extract services only when you have clear reasons: independent scaling needs, team autonomy requirements, or well-defined bounded contexts.

Q: When is the right time to move from monolith to microservices?

Consider microservices when: (1) your team exceeds 50+ developers and coordination is painful, (2) different parts of your system have vastly different scaling needs, (3) you need independent deployment cycles, (4) you have clear domain boundaries. If you can't articulate specific pain points, your monolith is probably fine.

Q: What is a modular monolith?

A modular monolith is a single deployable application with clear internal boundaries between modules. Each module owns its data and exposes clean interfaces. It gives you the simplicity of monolith deployment with the organizational benefits of clear boundaries. Many experts recommend this as the sweet spot for most companies.

Q: How do microservices affect development speed?

Initially, microservices slow you down significantly due to infrastructure complexity. Long-term, they can speed up large teams by enabling independent work. For small teams (< 20 developers), a monolith will almost always be faster. The break-even point depends on team size and domain complexity.

Q: Can a monolith scale to millions of users?

Absolutely. Stack Overflow serves 100M+ monthly visitors with a single monolith on ~9 servers. Shopify handles billions in transactions. The key is good architecture, caching, database optimization, and horizontal scaling (multiple instances behind a load balancer). Most scaling problems are data problems, not architecture problems.

Q: What are the hidden costs of microservices?

Infrastructure complexity (Kubernetes, service mesh, monitoring), network latency, distributed debugging, data consistency challenges, operational overhead (each service needs CI/CD, logging, alerting), and hiring difficulty (need DevOps expertise). Many teams underestimate these costs by 3-5x.

The complete guide to choosing between microservices and monolith architectures. Real-world examples from Netflix, Shopify, Stack Overflow, and more.

6 Criteria

6 Case Studies

12min Read Time

// TL;DR

THE SHORT ANSWER

Start with Monolith

< 50 developers, unclear boundaries, need to ship fast

When you hit limits

Consider Microservices

Team autonomy needed, clear bounded contexts, scale limits

Key insight: Amazon, Netflix, and Uber all started as monoliths. Extract services when you have specific pain points, not before.

// SECTION 01

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Scores based on typical team and project scenarios

Higher Score

Monolith

One codebase, one deployment, one team

Simplicity

95 ✓

Dev Speed

90 ✓

Debugging

85 ✓

Scaling

Team Scaling

Flexibility

Microservices

Independent services, independent deployments

Simplicity

Dev Speed

Debugging

Scaling

95 ✓

Team Scaling

90 ✓

Flexibility

90 ✓

// SECTION 02

DECISION FRAMEWORK

Use these criteria to guide your architecture choice

Team Size

Monolith wins < 20 developers

Microservices wins > 50 developers

Microservices shine when multiple teams need to work independently. For small teams, the overhead isn't worth it.

Scale Requirements

Monolith wins < 1M users

Microservices wins > 10M users with uneven load

If different parts of your app have vastly different scaling needs, microservices let you scale them independently.

Time to Market

Monolith wins Need to ship fast

Microservices wins Long-term maintainability priority

Monoliths are faster to build initially. Microservices pay off in the long run for large, evolving systems.

Domain Complexity

Monolith wins Single domain, shared data

Microservices wins Multiple distinct bounded contexts

Clear domain boundaries make microservices natural. Tightly coupled domains suffer from distributed data problems.

Deployment Frequency

Monolith wins Weekly/monthly releases

Microservices wins Multiple daily deployments

If teams need to deploy independently multiple times per day, microservices reduce coordination overhead.

// SECTION 03

REAL-WORLD SUCCESS STORIES

Learn from companies that made each architecture work

Monolith Success Stories

Basecamp

Millions

Ruby on Rails monolith

"The Majestic Monolith serves us incredibly well."

Lesson: Simplicity at scale is possible with good architecture

Shopify

Billions in GMV

Rails monolith (modular)

"We've scaled our monolith to handle Black Friday traffic."

Lesson: Modular monoliths can scale enormously

Stack Overflow

100M+ monthly

.NET monolith

"9 servers handle all our traffic."

Lesson: Performance optimization > distributed complexity

Microservices Success Stories

Netflix

200M+ subscribers

1000+ microservices

"We need independent scaling and fault isolation."

Lesson: At extreme scale, microservices are essential

Uber

Billions of trips

2000+ microservices

"Different parts of our system have very different needs."

Lesson: Complex domains benefit from service boundaries

Spotify

500M+ users

Autonomous squads with microservices

"Teams can ship independently."

Lesson: Organizational autonomy drives architecture

// SECTION 04

COMMON MISTAKES TO AVOID

Learn from others' failures before making your own

Premature decomposition

Breaking into microservices before understanding domain boundaries

Distributed monolith with all the downsides of both

Start monolith, extract when boundaries are clear

Shared database

Multiple services sharing the same database

Tight coupling, schema changes break everything

Each service owns its data, use APIs for access

Synchronous everywhere

All service-to-service communication is synchronous HTTP

Cascading failures, high latency

Use async messaging for non-critical paths

No service mesh

Managing service discovery, auth, and observability manually

Inconsistent security, debugging nightmares

Invest in infrastructure (Istio, Linkerd, or managed options)

Ignoring data consistency

Assuming ACID transactions work across services

Data inconsistencies, lost updates

Embrace eventual consistency, use sagas for workflows

// SECTION 05

RECOMMENDED TECH STACKS

What technologies to use with each architecture

Monolith Stack

Next.js / SvelteKit Full-stack framework

SSR + API routes in one

PostgreSQL Database

Reliable, feature-rich RDBMS

Prisma / Drizzle ORM

Type-safe database access

Vercel / Railway Hosting

Simple deployment, auto-scaling

Patterns:

MVCModular MonolithVertical Slice Architecture

Microservices Stack

Kubernetes Orchestration

Industry standard for containers

gRPC / REST Communication

Efficient inter-service calls

Kafka / RabbitMQ Messaging

Async, decoupled communication

Istio / Linkerd Service Mesh

Observability, security, traffic

Patterns:

Event-DrivenCQRSSaga PatternAPI Gateway

// SECTION 06

MIGRATION PATTERNS

How to safely move from monolith to microservices

Strangler Fig Pattern

Gradually replace parts of the monolith with microservices, routing traffic to new services incrementally.

Difficulty Medium

Timeframe 6-24 months

Best for: Legacy system modernization

Branch by Abstraction

Create abstractions in the monolith, then swap implementations to external services.

Difficulty Medium

Timeframe 3-12 months

Best for: Extracting specific domains

Parallel Run

Run both monolith and microservice simultaneously, compare results before switching.

Difficulty High

Timeframe 1-6 months per service

Best for: Critical business logic migration

// FAQ

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start with microservices for my new project?

When is the right time to move from monolith to microservices?

What is a modular monolith?

How do microservices affect development speed?

Can a monolith scale to millions of users?

What are the hidden costs of microservices?

Build Your Complete Tech Stack

Get personalized architecture and technology recommendations for your project

Start Building Compare Technologies